The Fraud Years

A review of Regina Watteel’s Fisman’s Fraud: The Rise of Canadian Hate Science

1. The Fraudulent Society

Fraud. It’s the tenor of the age. And corruption. But then corruption is implied by fraud. As more and more evidence emerges, the past four dismal years of coronavirus will be known as The Fraud Years. Not by any means, given the intelligence community’s willingness to use the entire population as their psyop guinea pigs, the first such years, nor will they be the last. But there is no doubt, “Covid-19” and “Fraud” will become synonymous.

Way back in ’22, Donald Lee came through town with his aptly titled What the Hell is Going On? magnum opus that took on the Cervante-esque task of tilting at every windmill of lies that spins all around us. His basic thesis was that all these various military, economic and environmental scams going on are frauds. Not history’s first frauds either of course, but just the latest in a long, long series, with you as the fall guy. Lee delivered it not as yet another nihilist tract but with a refreshing dose of self-confidence and spirituality. An optimism, almost. A good primer on connecting the dots, on pattern recognition. A facility I sometimes fear is vanishing from the human race.

But then I look around again, and see all the Grand Narratives collapsing—the WHO Pandemic Treaty like a torpedoed ship being abandoned for the lifeboats, [1] the entire scientific basis of the Covid-19 pandemic measures and, as Regina Watteel rightly calls them, “genetic vaccines,” and the three biggest asset empires in the world—JP Morgan Chase, State Street and Blackrock—bailing out of the ESG racket. [2] No doubt in part with one eye on the mushrooming farmers’ protests in Europe as desperate WEF types tighten the noose too soon. Watch for Klaus Schwab acolytes like Yuval Harari to start bolting for Ecuadoran or Costa Rican hideaways like President Zelensky any time now. Add to these narrative collapses, three recent wins in Canadian courts—the ruling on the Justin Trudeau government’s invocation of the Emergencies Act, the Purolator union case in British Columbia, [3] and the Alberta case against the mandates of former Chief Public Health Officer Deena Hinshaw. [4] Bonnie Henry, we’re coming for you next, with at least two cases pending against her vaccine mandates for healthcare staff.

Donald Lee wrote of fraud that “you can’t just create a grand fantasy out of thin air. People will immediately see through that. Fraud is always a deception based on truth. …And as Jack Cashill notes in the opening quote, fraud is always a collaborative effort. Few people are aware of the fraud, but many are enlisted to help who don’t realize they are being duped.” [5] Though it’s hard these days to figure what part of Covid-19 wasn’t a fantasy, and a deranged one at that. A nightmare for billions of people all at once, and none of it necessary. Except to the power interests. This is what Lee means by fraud.

Well, okay, it was a virus, and it was a biological weapon developed in a lab. That, unfortunately, wasn’t a fantasy. Neither was my six weeks of near-death experience with Covid-19. I still wasn’t about to inject myself with something cooked up in a lab by the equivalent of a convicted criminal with absolutely no regard to scientific procedure—at over $80 billion in fines just since 2010 for various forms of fraud, Pfizer, Johnson & Johnson, GlaxoSmithKline and compadres are in monetary terms history’s biggest criminals. [6] As was well known by any immunologist with a brain not incapacitated by bogus ideology or sheer greed, my natural immunity since then has kept me completely free of any relapses. Thank God for people like Dr. Knut Wittkowski, who very early in the “pandemic” spoke sense about the immune system in the face of blatant propaganda and spiraling hysteria. He helped me survive. And so many other brave souls like him who paid the price for their courage but survived with their souls intact. They resisted the grand fraud of the ages.

2. Fisman’s Grand Illusion

Which brings me to Regina Watteel’s book, Fisman’s Fraud: The Rise of Canadian Hate Science. David Fisman had positioned himself to be a combination of media darling and Trudeau government lapdog when he and his colleagues, Afia Amoako and Ashleigh Tuite released a paper, “Impact of population mixing between vaccinated and unvaccinated subpopulations on infectious disease dynamics: implications for SARS-CoV-2 transmission.” Fisman, a faculty member with the University of Toronto Dalla Lana School of Public Health, used a computer model to bolster the predetermined conclusion that the unvaccinated were driving both increased COVID-19 transmission and hospitalizations. No attempt was made to adjust the modeling with real-world data that had already accumulated in Canadian government databases. In what seems a rare move for a scientific paper, it used this conclusion to argue for government policy against allowing the unvaccinated access to public spaces and public transportation. This is why Watteel dubs it “hate science”: it identifies a specific group and then singles them out for exclusion if not outright punishment. Watteel, a PhD in statistics, analyzed Fisman et al.’s paper, concluding that it is one of the worst examples of scientific fraud she has ever seen:

“The three career mathematical modelers proceeded to pass off the fabricated results as fact despite no real data being used, no hypothesis being tested and no model validation of any kind. Under the guise of ‘science’ the researchers claimed the results supported the government’s harsh vaccine restrictions. When called out by troves of researchers from around the world for the flawed modeling and deceptive findings, the researchers refused to correct the record. Instead, the main author doubled down on his divisive rhetoric and support of punitive measures against the unvaccinated.” —Regina Watteel [7]

Regina Watteel, courtesy Peoples’ Party of Canada (PPC), for whom she is running as MP candidate for Ottawa Central.

Fisman has multiple conflicts of interest—something that used to matter in professional life but apparently no longer in this age of corruption. Watteel notes his receiving payment for “advisory roles” with Pfizer, AstraZeneca, the Ontario Nurses’ Association, Klick Health, JP Morgan Chase, Farallon Capital, the Canada Pension Plan, “and the infamous WE Charity.” [8] Once upon a time, this alone would have disqualified him from making any recommendations whatsoever to any government body. An ethical researcher would have recused himself. Further, he has been rewarded for his work with a position on the University of Toronto’s recently formed Institute for Pandemics.

In February 2022, Fisman publicly claimed that “a full three dose vaccine schedule prevents Omicron infection, Omicron transmission, and serious illness from SARS-2.” But as Watteel explains, “In the weeks that followed, real-world data continued to portray dismal protection from vaccination, with reported effectiveness of boosters in preventing symptomatic disease dropping to about 35% in just 10 weeks. Indeed, as the weeks and months went on, incident rates amongst the boosted were shown to be markedly higher than all other groups.” [9] Fisman proved a useful idiot to Justin Trudeau and the Prime Minister’s claim that cancer treatments and elective surgeries were being cancelled due to a surge in hospitalizations caused by the unvaccinated. Once again, the data proved the opposite: “Bardosh et al. (2022) aptly pointed out that these transmission trends had been painfully obvious to anyone paying attention: ‘Since early reports of post-vaccination transmission in mid-2021, it has become clear that vaccinated and unvaccinated individuals, once infected, transmit to others at similar rates.’” [10]

This is in addition to revelations from Pfizer that the vaccine was never clinically tested for its capacity to prevent transmission. A study by M. Palmer MD, S. Bhakdi MD, S. Hockertz PhD  concludes: “The clinical trials carried out by Pfizer contain no proof of any benefit conferred by the vaccine with respect to any clinically relevant endpoints. This applies to all tested age groups, and in particular to adolescents.” [11]

Watteel writes of how, in the various drafts the Fisman et al. paper passed through during its peer review process with the Canadian Medical Association Journal (CMAJ), the language grew progressively more strident in singling out the unvaccinated, despite the flimsy evidence to bolster its claims. Her meticulous assessment of the Fisman et al. paper comes to a dismal conclusion: “This ‘scientific’ model fails across the board.” [12]

She then attempted to get the paper retracted, along with many other international scientists across multiple disciplines: “from infectious diseases specialists and clinical researchers to neurologist to vascular surgeon, endocrinologist, computational expert, viral immunologist, physicists, statisticians, professionals in health law and public policy… the list goes on.” [13] Watteel appealed to the University of Toronto scientific ethics committee, the Canadian Medical Association Journal that published the study, and the Canadian Institute of Health Research (CIHR) which governs research standards in Canada. She even filed a criminal fraud case with the Ontario Provincial Police. At every turn, her claim was rejected. Yet Watteel’s argument is compelling, and far better substantiated than the Fisman et al. paper:

“There are five main reasons why this particular case of scientific misconduct requires attention: 1) the researchers’ clear intent; 2) the crucial role they played in deceiving the public; 3) the far-reaching impact of their fraudulent activity; 4) the willful backing by the establishment, and 5) the potential for future harm.” —Regina Watteel [14]

Scandalously, the Fisman et al. paper remains available online, while other high-quality, much more rigorous studies by independent scientists and researchers have been retracted, including Denis Rancourt’s important study on the harms of lockdowns. [15] Clearly, the medical-scientific establishment is colluding with the fraud.

3. The Abdication of Ethics and Human Rights

Watteel makes a strong case that the abdication of scientific ethics and the violations of Charter rights enabled by the Fisman et al. paper have created a toxic legacy of division in Canada. The unvaccinated were stigmatized, fired from their jobs or suspended without pay, not allowed on planes or trains, and vilified not only by our media but by our Prime Minister. Watteel’s husband, a physicist, was fired from his job with the federal government. Her two daughters—star athletes—were not only prevented from competing in university sports but were expelled from campus. Our so-called “human rights commissions” across the country were of no use in supporting Charter rights whatsoever. As Watteel concludes:

“Regardless of how provincial human rights commissions felt about harassment or discrimination based on vaccination status, they appeared unwilling to do anything about it. Instead, they claimed it was outside their purview.” [16]

This is exactly what I discovered when I filed a complaint against Canada Post for refusal of service due to not wearing a mask. When I firmly stated to the Postmistress my reasons for not doing so—private medical information I reminded her she had no right to—and the fact that she had no right to deny a public service to a Canadian citizen, she called the RCMP and I was treated to a visit at my home within the hour. (By contrast, a small business that was robbed in our valley waited days for an RCMP visit.) At no time did I threaten the Postmistress. I was firm with the RCMP officer on my Charter rights and reminded him that there is no science to support wearing masks to prevent transmission. He insisted masks “are a sign of respect for your neighbours.” I said, “No, it’s a sign of obedience.”

After filing with the Canada Post Ombudsman, I waited a year to even receive an email. The complaint was then summarily dismissed without investigation. I then referred it to the Canadian Human Rights Commission, who were only marginally more responsive to my communications. But in the end, they too sided with authority, concluding that “there is no reasonable basis in the evidence to support … alleged negative treatment on the part of the Respondent,” and that it was “reasonable for the Respondent to seek guidance from an enforcement officer regarding matters that could impact the overall health and safety of the staff and the public entering its premises.” Which begs the question: Since when are the RCMP medical advisors?  

Watteel reminds readers that this inversion of justice has no historical or legal precedent in Canadian law or human rights codes, particularly when it comes to vaccine mandates, travel restrictions and passports. As we saw with Dr. Anthony Fauci, the government official responsible for coronavirus directives in the US, these measures—including mask wearing—constantly flip-flopped during the pandemic, not based on science but on politics. In Canada, the government went against all precedent:  

“Prior to the pandemic, the legal establishment widely held the view that mandatory vaccination was unconstitutional. In the 1996 Canadian National Report on Immunization, lawyers for the Department of Health specifically stated that vaccination ‘cannot be made mandatory because of the Canadian Constitution.’ Indeed, as late as May of 2021 Trudeau publicly stated: ‘We’re not a country that makes vaccination mandatory.’ That same month, Privacy Commissioner Daniel Therrien said compulsory vaccination was ‘an encroachment on civil liberties’ that breaches the Privacy Act. His comments were in line with the basic principle that compulsory disclosure of medical information is ‘a massive violation of privacy.’” —Regina Watteel [17]

As Watteel concludes, the excuse of a “public health emergency” does not justify the suspension of all civil rights. This “emergency” itself was a fabrication given the provably low Infection Fatality Rates for all age groups, with even the most at-risk demographic—the extreme elderly and those with multiple comorbidities or morbid obesity—suffering only a 0.5% maximum IFR. Put another way, that’s a 99.5% survivability rate, far higher for younger people, making vaccinations of working-age people, children and infants not only unnecessary but reckless given what is now known about the millions of adverse reactions reported to surveillance databases like the Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System (VAERS) in the US, EudraVigilance in the European Union, and Yellow Card in the United Kingdom. “Pfizer’s own pharmacovigilance documents show that by June 2022, the company was aware of almost 5 million adverse events covering nearly every organ system—about 27% of them serious and debilitating.” [18] And that’s just one country!

Before I leave the final words to Ms. Watteel herself, I’d remind you that in addition to her book, there is a supplementary booklet available that documents all her communications with the various agencies she reached out to in addition to her research into Fisman et al. Fisman’s Fraud is another essential book setting the record straight for future generations who will want to know the truth about the Fraud—I mean, Covid-19 Years. Please support the author by purchasing a copy. [19] There is now an entire canon of such essential books (see my list below). [20]

“Without a demonstrated reduction in transmission, the benefits shift from communal to personal and, as such, individual rights become paramount. Mandating a vaccine for the sole purpose of achieving greater vaccination is simply the state vetoing the inalienable right to bodily autonomy.” —Regina Watteel [21]

---

[1] Michael Nevradakis, “WHO exhibiting signs of ‘desperation’ as New Zealand, Iran reject amendments to International Health Regulations,” The Defender/LifeSite News, February 16, 2024: https://www.lifesitenews.com/analysis/who-exhibiting-signs-of-desperation-as-new-zealand-iran-reject-amendments-to-international-health-regulations/?utm_source=daily-world-2024-02-17&utm_medium=email

[2] Thomas Catenucci, “JPMorgan Chase, BlackRock drop out of massive UN climate alliance in stunning move,” Fox Business News, February 15, 2024: https://www.foxbusiness.com/politics/jpmorgan-chase-drops-out-of-massive-un-climate-alliance-in-stunning-move

[3] Anthony Murdoch, “Ruling in favor of fired vaccine-free workers could end provincial jab mandates, former AG says,” LifeSite News, January 11, 2024: https://www.lifesitenews.com/news/ruling-in-favor-of-fired-vaccine-free-workers-could-end-provincial-jab-mandates-former-ag-says/?utm_source=daily-canada-2024-01-12&utm_medium=email

[4] Alejandro Melgar and Jillian Code, “Alberta Violates Public Health Act, Hinshaw not decision maker on COVID recommendations,” August 1, 2023: https://calgary.citynews.ca/2023/08/01/alberta-violated-public-health-act-hinshaw/ SEE ALSO: Viva Frei, “The Most Important Covid Court Ruling Out of Canada That You’ve Never Heard Of,” Rumble:

[5] Donald Lee, What the Hell is Going On? 2022, p. 85.

[6] Benjamin Adams, “Big Pharma Drug Makers Fined Over $82B in Violations Last Decade, Report Shows,” October 20, 2023: https://hightimes.com/news/big-pharma-drug-makers-fined-over-82b-in-violations-last-decade-report-shows/

[7] Regina Watteel, Fisman’s Fraud: The Rise of Canadian Hate Science, RainSong Books, an imprint of Whisperwood Publishing, Canada, p. 3.

[8] Regina Watteel, Fisman’s Fraud: The Rise of Canadian Hate Science, ibid., p. 22.

[9] Regina Watteel, Fisman’s Fraud: The Rise of Canadian Hate Science, ibid., p. 67, emphasis in original.

[10] Regina Watteel, Fisman’s Fraud: The Rise of Canadian Hate Science, ibid., p. 136.

[11] Regina Watteel, Fisman’s Fraud: The Rise of Canadian Hate Science, ibid., p. 150, emphasis mine.

[12] Regina Watteel, Fisman’s Fraud: The Rise of Canadian Hate Science, ibid., p. 93.

[13] Regina Watteel, Fisman’s Fraud: The Rise of Canadian Hate Science, ibid., p. 93.

[14] Regina Watteel, Fisman’s Fraud: The Rise of Canadian Hate Science, ibid., p. 43.

[15] Steve Kirsch, “Our paper critical of the COVID vaccines will be retracted by Cureus!” February 19, 2024:

Our paper critical of the COVID vaccines will be retracted by Cureus!

 

[16] Regina Watteel, Fisman’s Fraud: The Rise of Canadian Hate Science, ibid., p. 144.

[17] Regina Watteel, Fisman’s Fraud: The Rise of Canadian Hate Science, ibid., p. 161.

[18] Regina Watteel, Fisman’s Fraud: The Rise of Canadian Hate Science, ibid., p. 157.

[19] https://www.amazon.ca/Fismans-Fraud-Rise-Canadian-Science/dp/1988363241

[20] SEE ALSO: Ronnie Cummins and Dr. Joseph Mercola, The Truth About COVID-19, Robert F. Kennedy Jr., The Real Anthony Fauci, Dr. Peter McCullough and John Leake, The Courage to Face COVID-19, Steven W. Mosher, The Politically Incorrect Guide to Pandemics, Naomi Wolf, The Bodies of Others, Julius Ruechel, Autopsy of a Pandemic, etc.  

[21] Regina Watteel, Fisman’s Fraud: The Rise of Canadian Hate Science, ibid., pp. 167, 171, emphasis mine.