“The best way to keep a prisoner from escaping is to make sure he never knows he’s in prison.” —Fyodor Dostoevsky
1. The Lords of Misrule
The end of the global elites’ endgame for human freedom is in sight! British Prime Minister Boris Johnson announced in Parliament January 19 that mask and vaccine passport mandates will end in Britain as of January 20. “Speaking in the House of Commons Wednesday, Johnson said scientists believe the wave of coronavirus cases caused by the Omicron variant had peaked nationally and as such the country would revert to its ‘Plan A’ response to the virus, according to the BBC,” reports the US White House wire service. “The end of ‘Plan B’ lifts many coronavirus restrictions Johnson imposed on England. The prime minister said that beginning Thursday, COVID passports for entering nightclubs and large events would no longer be required, though private venues can continue to use them if they wish. People will no longer be advised to work from home, and employers may coordinate a return to offices.”
According to LifeSite News, “Johnson said that organizations can still ‘choose to use the NHS [National Health Service] COVID Pass voluntarily.’” That, as we used to say, ought to go over like the proverbial lead balloon with a population fed up with two years of arbitrary, unscientific restrictions. Two years of killed Christmases, Easters and Thanksgivings, and families forcibly kept away from elders dying in prison-like nursing homes. At very least, the voluntary use of a vax passport in Britain will act as a sorting process, exposing the mini-tyrants for whom Covid regulations have proven a boom period. Such types won’t want to let go of their power willingly. However, as we’ll see in this article, they too—like political leaders—will be legally held to account for their part in the perpetration of a massive global fraud.
In true political fashion, British Health Secretary Sajid Javid tried to lay claim to the government’s success with its Covid responses, callously ignoring the millions of people harmed by repeated lockdowns, adverse reactions and deaths due to experimental vaccines, and a generation of children and university students whose education has been seriously compromised. There have now been several studies done on the harms of lockdowns, which according to some experts have far outpaced the harms done by the coronavirus itself. Canadian academic Douglas W. Allen, Department of Economics, Simon Fraser University, in a recent paper wrote that, “it is possible that lockdown will go down as one of the greatest peacetime policy failures in Canada’s history.” Allen’s report and conclusions are based on a meta-study of 80 different academic studies. His conclusions are supported by an independently produced study by Professor Denis Rancourt, which agrees that, “There has been government recklessness by action and negligence by omission. Institutional measures have been needed for a long time to stem corruption in both medicine and public health policy.” Professor Rancourt had already reached these conclusions by December 2020.
2. Goodbye Covid Dystopia, Hello Nuremberg 2.0
Has Prime Minister Johnson had an epiphany, or finally conceded the evidence provided by independent scientists? Hardly. His motivation for the sudden rollback of Covid restrictions has been called into question, since even his own party has been scandalized by recent revelations of his unmasked social events. Some party members are calling for his resignation. And is it just coincidental that a British legal team headed by Hannah Rose has filed a case with the International Criminal Court at The Hague, naming among the respondents Boris Johnson? According to the ICC’s own website: “A complaint has been filed with the Prosecutor of the International Criminal Court on December 6th, 2021 by a team from the UK on behalf of the people alleging crimes committed by UK government officials and international world leaders of various violations of the Nuremberg Code, crimes against humanity, war crimes and crimes of aggression perpetrated against the peoples of the UK.”
The complainants lodging the suit are Dr. Mike Yeadon, former VP and chief scientist at Pfizer UK; Piers Corbyn, astrophysicist, retired police officer and brother of Labour party politician Jeremy Corbyn; retired Constable Mark Sexton; funeral director John O’Looney, who reported that the body count in his business only exploded once the vaccines were rolled out; activist Johnny McStay; and nurse Louise Shotbolt.
In addition to Johnson, defendants named in the suit include Chief Medical Officer for England Christopher Witty; former Secretary of State for Health and Social Care Matt Hancock and his successor, the aforementioned Sajid Javid; Pfizer CEO Albert Bourla; Moderna CEO Pascal Soriot; Johnson & Johnson CEO Alex Gorsky; AstraZeneca CEO Stephane Bancel; as well as leading figures from the global cabal behind the use of Covid as the Trojan Horse for the ‘Great Reset,’ including WHO Director General Tedros Adanhom Ghebreyesus; Bill Gates; and several others, not least among them the Great Reset architect himself, Klaus Schwab. Dr. Anthony Fauci is also named in the suit. Judging by Robert F. Kennedy Jr.’s new book, The Real Anthony Fauci, there should be enough evidence for a conviction in that book alone.
Another British lawyer, Anna DeBouisseret, recently outlined the various domestic and international statutes that are being shattered by vaccine mandates and passports. Among the statutes she cites are the Universal Declaration of Human Rights, European Declaration of Human Rights, Nuremberg Code and the Helsinki Declaration, among others. The latter document, also known as the World Medical Association Declaration of Helsinki, is subtitled “Ethical Principles for Medical Research Involving Humans,” and echoes many of the foundational principles of the Nuremberg Code. Among its General Principles: “The health of my patient will be my first consideration” (#3), and: “While the primary purpose of medical research is to generate new knowledge, this goal can never take precedence over the rights and interests of individual research subjects” (#8), quite the opposite of medical governing bodies that have censured or even de-licensed doctors who provide preventative care or alternative treatments to their patients.
It is also unethical to fail to inform patients of all known treatments for any health condition or to withhold such treatments should they so choose. Yet courageous physicians such as Canada’s Dr. Daniel Nagase, despite saving critically ill patients with Ivermectin, was de-licensed in his home province of Alberta. American physician Dr. Zelenko estimates he has saved thousands of lives with his treatment protocol. What’s shocking is that people have been so blinded by the mass hypnosis carried out by their governments that they don’t even realize they’re subjects of medical experimentation. Critically, the Helsinki Declaration requires that medical researchers “consider the ethical, legal and regulatory norms and standards for research involving human subjects in their own countries as well as applicable international norms and standards” (#10). Clearly, this has not been the case, as coercive vaccine mandates and passports have violated every national and international statute related to fully informed consent of the patient.
It’s for these reasons that Ms. DeBouisseret warns health practitioners that, just as with the first Nuremberg Trials in 1946–47, the excuse, “I was only following orders,” is not considered a valid legal defense. Nor can such individuals plead ignorance, since their education and training include medical ethics that they are pledged to uphold as professional caregivers. “We’re identifying who’s injecting people, who is responsible for violating these international codes and we’re serving them with Notices of Liability,” says DeBouisseret. In Canada, a similar campaign using a Notice of Liability (NOL) to employers has halted the rollout of vaccine mandates in many British Columbia school districts. These notices put employers and school boards on notice that they will be held liable for any damages or deaths resulting from Covid injections. Justin Trudeau’s federal government may have thought they were being clever by downloading the burden of responsibility to local governments, but they seriously miscalculated. DeBouisseret says a similar campaign of NOLs served to school boards has been initiated in England, with some districts already backing off.
DeBouisseret goes so far as to call mass vaccination campaigns “bioterrorism,” noting that under UK Common Law, the first principle is one that reflects the traditional Hippocratic Oath: “First, do no harm.” She explains that under both British and international statutes, all humans are born with bodily sovereignty and that any encroachment on that power of individual choice is a violation culpable under law. This principle applies even under conditions of war. DeBouisseret cites the UK Crimes Against the Person Act, which makes it illegal to wound another person. Under this statute, unless fully informed consent is received in writing from a patient, an injection that breaks the skin could legally be considered a “wound.”
The ICC lawsuit parallels the one being brought by Dr. Reiner Fuellmich’s legal team, the Corona Investigative Committee, about which I recently wrote in “Reiner Fuellmich Announces International Trial.” The team has compiled evidence from 150 expert witnesses and whistleblowers from Pfizer, Facebook, the WHO and other organizations and is within two weeks of launching his own grand jury trial, seeking indictments against Fauci, Tedros, Gates and Christian Drosten, who allegedly falsified data about the PCR test, thus providing a fraudulent foundation for government ‘emergency measures’ decrees. Dr. Fuellmich has stated in interviews that his team has enough evidence to prove deliberate malfeasance, based on analyses of Covid vaccine batch or lot numbers that reveal an intentional alternation between benign and potentially lethal doses. The investigative team’s findings show that the three top vaccine makers—PfizerBioNtech, Moderna, and J&J—are deliberately “looking for lethal dosages,” according to Fuellmich. “It is very obvious… if you follow the lot numbers… the batches… there is no benign explanation for this; it is intentional.” He believes the results of his grand jury trial will open the floodgates to personal injury or class action lawsuits that could easily start at $1 million per person for injuries sustained either from vaccination or the various harms of lockdown.
As with the ICC suit filed by Hannah Rose, et al., Fuellmich’s case relies on the expert testimony of Dr. Mike Yeadon, who confirms the rotating toxicity of Covid vaccine batches. In his interview with Maria Zeee, Fuellmichdoesn’t mince words: “We think that after having spoken with a number of psychology and psychiatry professors… this is a huge psychological operation. It has been planned for at least three decades, maybe longer. They’re using all kinds of panic mongering tools. In Germany we have the ‘Panic Paper,’ written by the German Secretary of the Interior. In great detail it explains how to get the population to panic. For example, that we want to make children feel responsible for the tortured death of their parents and grandparents if they don’t wash their hands or wear masks. This is insanity. That’s why we believe the people behind this are psychopaths and sociopaths.”
3. A New Earth
As both Fuellmich and DeBouisseret explain, no matter how high level the criminals are behind the engineering and deployment of the Covid dystopia, they will pay a stiff price. Obviously, the punishment must fit the crime, just as in the original Nuremberg Trials, where the worst mass murderers were executed while their lower level flunkies served lengthy prison terms. Fuellmich also speaks of the total confiscation of monetary resources of organizations such as the WHO, World Economic Forum, Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation, and any other corporate bodies complicit in the crime. In his vision—and it’s an exhilarating one—these funds would then be used to compensate the millions of people who have lost jobs, businesses, personal health or family members.
Fuellmich sees a post-trial swing away from the globalism preached and enforced by what he calls the “Davos clique,” toward more localized forms of regional governance, where massive bureaucracies such as the WHO or EU are consigned to the garbage can of history. “We’re going to have to start from scratch—build up our own supply systems as far as energy, as far as food systems are concerned—in our regions, and then connect with each other, exchange ideas. But never again will we allow people to rule from above, from very far away.”
In that respect, Fuellmich is only now—after a century—catching up to the concept of “mutual aid” formulated by Russian evolutionary scientist and political theorist Peter Kropotkin. Although his funeral was a massive, state-sponsored event in Soviet Russia, while alive he refused any alliances with the centralized Communist government. It was antithetical to his vision of self-governing communities linked in a cooperative network, yet each one still fully autonomous. Like Fuellmich, Kropotkin wanted nothing to do with being ruled “from above, from very far away,” by unaccountable bureaucrats of centralized governments in Moscow, London or Berlin. No more will we kowtow to billionaire elites who whip the public into hysteria for their own purposes. Nor will we accept their spurious logic that only a globally regimented society of digital slavery is the only way forward, the only way to “save the Earth.” As more recent anthropological and archaeological evidence is revealing, the Hobbesian idea that human society can only function under authoritarian governments has proven a hollow, self-serving lie. Kropotkin glimpsed this more than 100 years ago when he wrote: “…the deeper we penetrate into the history of early institutions, the less we find grounds for the military theory of origin of authority. Even that power which later on became such a source of oppression seems, on the contrary, to have found its origin in the peaceful inclinations of the masses.” As professor of comparative archaeology David Wengrow and anthropologist David Graeber recently wrote: “…the overall direction of history—at least until very recently—would seem to be the very opposite of globalization.”
So while it may be premature to declare, as in the Book of Revelation, chapter 21, verse 1: “And I saw a new heavens and a new earth, for the former heavens and the former earth are gone…” it’s never too early—or too late—to hold that vision for ourselves and our loved ones. In Biblical symbolism, “heavens” often refer to governments; thus, “a new heavens and a new earth” can easily be symbolic of new governments and new societies. The apostle John’s vision of a “new earth” comes as the culmination of a battle of the forces of light and darkness. In the meantime, then, we salute these Warriors of Light—Fuellmich, DeBouisseret, Rose and so many others—and pray Godspeed to their efforts to seek justice for us all.
 To view Johnson’s announcement on video see: https://www.bitchute.com/video/4yx9J1A5IBS5/?list=notifications&randomize=false
 “Boris Johnson ends England’s COVID restrictions, including mask mandates and vaccine passports, amid scandal,” White House Wire, January 19, 2022: https://whitehousewire.com/2022/01/19/boris-johnson-ends-englands-covid-restrictions-including-mask-mandates-and-vaccine-passports-amid-scandal/
 “Boris Johnson announces UK will drop mask mandates, most COVID restriction,” LifeSite News, January 19, 2022: https://www.lifesitenews.com/news/uk-johnson-drops-most-covid-restrictions-as-he-announces-move-to-plan-a-measures/
 “Covid Lockdown Cost/Benefits: A Critical Assessment of the Literature,” Douglas W. Allen (emphasis mine): https://www.sfu.ca/~allen/LockdownReport.pdf
 “Measures do not prevent deaths, transmission is not by contact, masks provide no benefit, vaccines are inherently dangerous: Review update of recent science relevant to COVID-19 policy,” Denis Rancourt, PhD, published by PANDA (Pandemics Data & Analysis), December 28, 2020: https://ratical.org/PandemicParallaxView/Rancourt-ScienceReviewCovidPolicy.pdf
 ICC Nuremberg Case, December 6, 2021 (emphasis in original): http://coronacases.wiki/index.php/wiki/icc-uk-nuremberg-case/
 Now known as the “Zelenko Protocol”: https://vladimirzelenkomd.com/prophylaxis-protocol/
 Declaration of Helsinki, World Medical Association: https://www.wma.net/policies-post/wma-declaration-of-helsinki-ethical-principles-for-medical-research-involving-human-subjects/
 “Lawyer Anna DeBouisseret Explains Who Will Be Liable Under the Law,” Rumble, January 11, 2022: https://rumble.com/vscjlw-lawyer-anna-de-bouisseret-explains-who-will-be-held-liable-under-the-law-mu.html?fbclid=IwAR2bsTjbM7G6wwuRsChBd3
 “BC School Trustee Campaign,” Action4Canada: https://action4canada.com/bc-trustee-campaign/
 “Reiner Fuellmich Announces International Trial,” Sean Arthur Joyce, Substack, January 14, 2022:
The same article was published on my blog on January 11, 2022: https://chameleonfire1.wordpress.com/2022/01/11/reiner-fuellmich-announces-international-trial/
 “PREMEDITATED MASS MURDER? Reiner Fuellmich's Upcoming Legal Battle Against Gates, Fauci & Tedros,” Brighteon: https://www.brighteon.com/86f0fe43-ed90-4a7c-8198-ff3b7f948fc8 SEE ALSO: Interview of Reiner Fuellmich by Maria Zeee, Bluecat Media: https://www.brighteon.com/86f0fe43-ed90-4a7c-8198-ff3b7f948fc8
 Interview of Reiner Fuellmich by Maria Zeee, Bluecat Media: https://www.brighteon.com/86f0fe43-ed90-4a7c-8198-ff3b7f948fc8
 Peter Kropotkin, Mutual Aid: A Factor in Evolution, Introduction by George Woodcock, Black Rose Books, Montreal/New York, 1989, p. 159 (first published in 1902).
 David Graeber and David Wengrow, The Dawn of Everything: A New History of Humanity, Signal/McClelland & Stewart, 2021, p. 124 (emphasis mine).