Genocide? What Genocide?
1. Mass Denial of the Obvious
Not admitting to the universal scale of the carnage from the experimental mRNA ‘vaccines’ would be the moral equivalent of pretending no such thing as the Holocaust happened. Indeed, Holocaust survivor Vera Sharav has loudly protested the medical experimentation allowed in the name of coronavirus expediency—an abrogation of the very standards established at the Nuremberg Trials in response to live human experimentation in the Nazi death camps. The organization she founded, the Alliance for Human Research Protection, was also born from these ashes in the hope that such horrors might never be repeated. [1] Tragically, her hopes have been dashed with the global rollout of mRNA injections since 2021. A terrible toll of deaths, injuries and permanent disabilities has erupted in the wake of this vaccination campaign. These very real, very human stories of tragedy deserve more than being ‘cancelled’ in mainstream news and social media. They deserve to be heard and they deserve every support society can offer them. You can read some of these stories at the Substack newsletter Real Not Rare: The Faces of the Vaccine Injured.[2] Keep a box of tissues handy.
The real test of what remains of our humanity in the 21st century will be how we respond to the harrowing experiences of the vaccine-injured. Yet as if to illustrate just how brainwashed our political ‘leaders’ remain, three years on, when British MP Andrew Bridgen tweeted: “As one consultant cardiologist [3] said to me, this is the biggest crime against humanity since the Holocaust,” he was screamed down in a fusillade of abuse as an “antisemite.” Not surprisingly, two of his harshest critics were “Matt Hancock, responsible for the UK’s pandemic response and mass Covid vaccinations, and Prime Minister Rishi Sunak, a World Economic Forum member whose hedge fund invested heavily in shares of Moderna,” according to investigative reporter Igov Chudov. [4] He also asks the pointed question: “Is Vera Sharav, a Holocaust survivor objecting to Covid vaccine mandates, an antisemite too?” Chudov—himself a Jew—is careful to note that Bridgen did not compare the two tragedies, but said it’s “the biggest crime against humanity since the Holocaust,” a fair statement given what we now know.
Unsurprisingly for the bought-and-paid-for media and medical establishment, the response has been, “Genocide? What genocide?” A similar reaction was common during World War II when rumours of the concentration camps first leaked, until the US Army liberated camp survivors and army filmmakers documented the trenches filled with still-unburied corpses. Denial was no longer an option for anyone seeing these films. By contrast, Toby Rogers has dubbed today’s society-wide denial “The Great Double Down”: “One might think that being proven wrong over and over again would elicit a certain sense of humility on the part of the mainstream gatekeepers. Unfortunately that’s not the world we live in. Everywhere I look I see the mainstream gatekeepers doubling down on the wrong answer.” [5]
When one peels back the multiple layers of deception thanks to the release of the Twitter files, the Pfizer document dump analyzed by Dr. Naomi Wolf’s team, [6] and courageous doctors and scientists who continually speak out at great cost to their careers, there are not one but several ‘elephants in the room.’ But the largest, most shadowy ‘elephant’ of all—the one buried most deeply in the shadows of this war room—is eugenics. Toby Rogers calls out this hidden ‘elephant’ in his recent Substack post on what he describes as a “cull” of seniors, kids, and the disabled: “We live in a country that practices eugenics right out in the open and calls it enlightened and benevolent policy (just like the Third Reich Germans).” [7]
As I explain in a 10,000-word essay eventually to be published in book form, this philosophy has captured the elites for nearly 200 years now. The germ of it can actually be found more than two millennia ago in the philosophy of Plato’s Republic, where class divisions in society are said to be a fact of nature, with only the aristocracy fit to rule. Then, in the 19th century, with the writings of Francis Galton, Thomas Malthus and Charles Darwin—all related, interestingly—eugenics as a philosophy was formalized. It was eagerly adopted by the new industrial and intellectual elites, among them T.H. Huxley, who coined the phrase “nature red in tooth and claw” to justify the exploitation of the working class in brutal factory conditions and the use of child labour in mines and factories. After all, they’re ‘inferiors’ anyway; what does it matter if they die in droves? Aren’t we just ‘purifying’ the genetic stock if they die? So goes the eugenics rationale.
Early in the 20th century American and Canadian governments began sterilizing those they deemed ‘unfit’ to reproduce—the mentally ill or learning handicapped, members of certain racial groups. The excuse then was that this would “preserve a healthy germ line” in human genetics. The excuse now is ‘immunizing’ the global population against Covid-19 and its variants. As Vera Sharav has explained, the Nazis began their march on the road to Hell in the 1930s by turning the medical profession in Germany into eugenics practitioners, urging parents of ‘defective’ or chronically ill children to have them euthanized “for the good of all,” i.e. the German people. The film Caring Corrupted: The Killing Nurses of the Third Reich documents this nearly-forgotten chapter in Nazi history. [8] The slippery slope from there to the death camps was practically a foregone conclusion. The realization that eugenics has influenced public health policy for at least a century is quite possibly the most sickening thing I’ve had to stomach in all my three decades as a journalist. But, aside from the power politics and the more obvious motive of rampant greed, it explains a lot. Especially if as a member of these elites you believe that the only way to ‘save the Earth’ is to reduce its population by two-thirds.
2. Seeking an Accurate Picture of Vaccine Adverse Reactions
Do you know a family member, friend or neighbor who suffered adverse reactions to Covid-19 vaccines? Then there are concerned physicians and healthcare advocates who want to hear from you. Through the efforts of Dr. Charles Hoffe, Dr. Stephen Malthouse and many others volunteering their time, a Canadian website, vaxxtracker.com, has been established to collect data directly from people suffering adverse events (AEs) in reaction to coronavirus vaccines. In addition, US-based researchers Igor Chudov [9] and Steve Kirsch [10] are using their considerable online followings to reach out for AE reports from the public. Both can be reached through their Substack newsletters. They are particularly interested in reports of those who “died suddenly” after vaccination. Former Wall St. investment advisor Edward Dowd testified in Washington that, based on insurance actuarial data, there was a 40 percent increase in excess mortality rate in 2021 among people aged 25-64—a rate unprecedented since these records started being kept. No wonder job vacancies are going unfilled. [11]
Dr. Patrick Provost of the Department of Microbiology, Infectious diseases and Immunology at Québec’s Université Laval recently reported that, contrary to both government and media reporting, “The relative prevalence of side effects following Covid-19 vaccination is largely underestimated and does not correspond to reality.” These findings were published in the International Journal of Vaccine Theory, Practice, and Research. [12] Another study published in BMC Infectious Diseases concluded that, “the total number of fatalities due to Covid-19 inoculation may be as high as 278,000,” and therefore, “the available governmental data should be further investigated.” [13] Based on his surveys, Steve Kirsch estimates this figure could be as high as 500,000 in the US alone.
A non-governmental national database, the Canadian Adverse Event Reporting System (CAERS), is still in the process of building an accurate picture of just how many people in Canada have suffered adverse reactions.[14] The equivalent American database, the Vaccine Adverse Events Reporting System (VAERS), has been shown in studies to capture as little as one percent of estimated actual cases. [15] The problem is that both systems are voluntary, not compulsory for physicians. In addition, Canadian doctors such as Dr. Hoffe have described the byzantine reporting requirements as self-defeating, especially for overworked physicians already hard pressed for time. Some doctors, including Dr. Hoffe and Ontario physician Dr. Patrick Phillips, were punished by their medical colleges for reporting AEs from Covid-19 injections.
The Canadian government continues to claim that adverse reactions to the vaccines are “one in a million,” but this figure is vastly underestimated. According to CAERS, reported AEs affect every age category, but are highest in prime working-age people aged 30–39 (17.5%) and 40–49 (25.6% of reports), followed by ages 50–59 (22.9%), and 60–69 (15.2%). This could easily explain the sudden “labour shortage.” CAERS reports that over 97% of those reporting AEs “had significant enough reactions or concerns that they made contact with a physician,” with 33% requiring urgent care. The vast majority of reported AEs became chronic conditions (73%). The CBC recently reported that Canada’s Vaccine Injury Support Program has already paid out $2.8 million in compensation to those disabled by the coronavirus vaccines. That only covers 50 individuals suffering permanent disabilities such as paralysis and Guillain-Barré Syndrome. More than 1,200 claims are still under review. [16]
According to the Open VAERS website, as of January 13, 2023 there were 1.5 million reports of AEs filed in the US. This includes 33,746 deaths, 189,384 hospitalizations and 144,049 patients who required urgent care following vaccination. There were 62,253 recorded as “permanently disabled,” with 16,221 cases of myocarditis, 16,626 cases of Bell’s Palsy, 18,626 heart attacks and nearly 5,000 miscarriages among pregnant women. [17] Multiply these figures by a factor of at least 100 to compensate for the under-reporting factor to get a sense of the true picture. Contrast this with the 1976 Swine flu vaccination campaign in the US, when the vaccine was pulled after reports of only 500 cases nationwide of Guillain-Barré Syndrome and 25 deaths. Vaxxtracker.com is adding its own Canadian data to the VAERS figures, driving the numbers even higher. [18] Since its launch last October, it has received 22,398 reports in December and nearly 10,000 in January.
Yet both Health Canada and the US Centres for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) continue to insist the vaccines are “safe and effective and severe reactions after vaccination are rare.” Contrast that with the recently completed analysis of thousands of pages of Pfizer clinical trial documents completed by Dr. Naomi Wolf’s team led by Amy Kelly. [19] What’s so disturbing about this data dump is how much Pfizer already knew about AEs prior to unleashing their vaccine on the public. This information was released by court order when Pfizer tried to have the data sealed for 75 years. University of Guelph virologist Dr. Byram Bridle, conducting his own analysis of the documents, concluded that Pfizer’s trial of over 40,000 participants showed no evidence of any benefit from the vaccine. [20] If anything, the data showed the reverse, with reinfections and hospitalizations increasing with each booster. [21] Numerous peer-reviewed studies now show that the vaccines actually suppress the immune system, leading to resurgence of other diseases. [22] All this risk for a virus that according to the best available scientific data, has only a 0.0003% Infection Fatality Rate (IFR) for those aged 0–19, 0.01% among those 30–39, and only 0.5% even for those in the highest risk category, ages 60–69 and beyond. [23] Covid-19 IFR rises with age but even at its worst has not proven statistically worse than an average flu season.
What’s left out of these dry statistics is the very real human cost—the personal stories of those whose lives have been forever damaged by loss of a loved one or an adverse reaction to a coronavirus vaccine that has ruined their health. As I reported in my article on the Justice for the Vaccinated tour, we heard firsthand testimony from two locals seriously damaged by the vaccines. Nelson resident Kristen, only in her 30s, suffered severe neurological damage. “I had seizures and convulsions and lost the ability to speak at times. One minute I could walk and the next I was presenting like I had Parkinson’s.” Another young man named Justin suffered a stroke and temporarily lost his ability to write and speak or walk normally, though these abilities are gradually returning. The Substack newsletter “Real Not Rare” documents case after case of people whose lives have been ruined by the vaccines. A 19-year-old New York woman named Olivia was encouraged by her doctor to get a second dose even after initial adverse reactions of dizziness, extreme nausea, visual disturbances and leg numbness. “Less than 3 days later, I could not breathe, I had extreme chest pains and could not walk more than a few steps without gasping for air. My legs went numb, and I could not feel my face.” [24] The booster left her with pericarditis and POTS syndrome, “which has left me housebound and unable to attend school or work.”
These are the human faces that our “pandemic” masters dare not look into.
[1] See “Our Mission,” Alliance for Human Research Protection: https://ahrp.org/about/
[2]
[3] Possibly Dr. Aseem Malhotra?
[4] Igor Chudov, “Anti-Vaccine MP Andrew Bridgen is NOT an Antisemite!”, Igor’s Newsletter, Substack, January 12, 2023:
[5] Toby Rogers, “The Great Double Down,” Substack, January 11, 2023:
[6] “Groundbreaking New Book Sends Shockwaves Through Pfizer’s Criminal Enterprise,” Daily Clout, January 10, 2023: https://dailyclout.io/groundbreaking-new-book-sends-shockwaves-through-pfizers-criminal-enterprise/
[7] Dr. Toby Rogers, The FDA "major shift" = an annual cull of seniors, kids, and the disabled, Substack, January 25, 2023:
[8] Caring Corrupted: The Killing Nurses of the Third Reich, YouTube:
[9] Igor Chudov, “Know Anyone who #DiedSuddenly? Let’s Crowdsource Information on Sudden Deaths,” Substack, January 23, 2023:
[10] Steve Kirsch, “Bhakdi/Burkhardt pathology results show 93% of people who died after being vaccinated were killed by the vaccine,” Substack, December 28, 2021:
[11] Steve Kirsch, “Highlights from the Ron Johnson COVID vax meeting,” including testimony on Capitol Hill by Edward Dowd, December 9, 2022:
[12] Patrick Provost, “The Blind Spot in COVID-19 Vaccination Policies: Under-Reported Adverse Events,” International Journal of Vaccine Theory, Practice, and Research, published January 12, 2023: https://www.ijvtpr.com/index.php/IJVTPR/article/view/65
[13] Mark Skidmore, “The role of social circle COVID-19 illness and vaccination experiences in COVID-19 vaccination decisions: an online survey of the United States population,” BMC Infectious Diseases, January 24, 2023: https://bmcinfectdis.biomedcentral.com/articles/10.1186/s12879-023-07998-3
[14] The Canadian government relies upon its own database, the Canadian Adverse Events Following Immunization Surveillance System (CAEFISS), but it is widely viewed as deeply flawed.
[15] Martin Armstrong, “VAERS Admits Fewer Than 1% of Vaccine Adverse Events Are Reported,” October 26, 2021 (see link to downloadable paper): https://www.armstrongeconomics.com/international-news/medicine/vaers-admits-fewer-than-1-of-vaccine-adverse-events-are-reported/The capture rate is higher for specific diseases such as Guillain-Barré Syndrome, anaphylaxis and vaccine associated paralytic polio after oral polio vaccine. SEE: The reporting sensitivity of the Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System (VAERS) for anaphylaxis and for Guillain-Barré syndrome,” US National Library of Medicine, November 3, 2020: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/33039207/
[16] Karin Larson, “$2.8 million paid out so far by Vaccine Injury Support Program,” CBC News, January 6, 2023: https://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/british-columbia/covid-19-vaccine-injuries-compensation-canada-1.6704655?fbclid=IwAR3Jwki1_exzwZ0kqM7R0IA2nJTuoEYeSQ
[17] Open VAERS reports through January 13, 2023: https://www.openvaers.com/covid-data
[18] Vaxxtracker.com, Covid-19 statistics: https://www.vaxxtracker.com/VaxStatistics.aspx
[19] Daily Clout, “Groundbreaking New Book Sends Shockwaves Through Pfizer’s Criminal Enterprise,” January 10, 2023: https://dailyclout.io/groundbreaking-new-book-sends-shockwaves-through-pfizers-criminal-enterprise/
[20] Steve Kirsch, “Professor Byram Bridle: ‘No evidence of any vax benefit’,” Substack, January 24, 2023:
[21] Alex Berenson, “URGENT: Two new studies show mRNA-jabbed people have a much higher risk of getting Covid than unvaccinated people,” Substack, December 20, 2022:
[22] For example, see Stephanie Seneff et al., “Innate immune suppression by SARS-CoV-2 mRNA vaccinations: The role of G-quadruplexes, exosomes, and MicroRNAs,” US National Library of Medicine, June 2022: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9012513/
[23] Angelo Maria Pezzulo, Catherine Axfors, et al., “Age-stratified infection fatality rate of COVID-19 in the non-elderly population,” US National Library of Medicine database, January 1, 2023: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/36341800/
[24] “Real Not Rare,” Substack, December 10, 2022:
Thanks, appreciate your hard work reporting this shameful heartbreaking and soul destroying madness. As Viva Frei pointed out on his podcast yesterday, he is angry that one no longer can ask what caused someone to die suddenly. It is not that people in the past did not die suddenly. But now the frequency is rising and the normal questions associated with such an unexpected event are now verboten. The mind f--k is working.