The Old Castle Theatre in Castlegar, BC on Friday, April 9 was packed with people anxious to hear from three courageous doctors, currently touring the Kootenays to warn of the risks of inoculating children with Covid-19 gene therapy ‘vaccines.’ Dr. Stephen Malthouse, Dr. Sofia Bayfield and Dr. Kevin Sclater were given a standing ovation for their determination to provide the public with accurate information about Covid-19 despite high personal and professional costs. They were introduced by Kari Simpson, president of the Canadian Voters’ Association, a passionate advocate for democratic accountability in response to the Covid crisis. This is now the third stage of Doctors on Tour after a first leg on Vancouver Island and the Okanagan and a second tour of Northern BC. Simpson said her organization will be launching a tour themed “Ignite Your Rights: Take Back Our Democracy.”
“Covid is a gift to Canada because it’s been a wake-up call to make us realize how much power health officials have in this country,” said Simpson. “Nobody two years ago would have thought the government would have locked us down and make it impossible to meet because they don’t want us sharing information with people. It’s now or never, folks. We either stop this in its tracks or we won’t get another chance.”
Leave Our Kids Alone
The priority on this phase of Doctors on Tour is to respond to the push to vaccinate children ages 5–12. The doctors discussed the pertinent questions regarding the need for and safety of the ‘vaccines’ for children. What is the risk to your child from Covid-19? There have only been 15 children in Canada who died of Covid-19—all had pre-existing co-morbidities. One study on PubMed said the lowest risk of hospitalization in all age categories is in ages 5–11. A child’s powerful innate immune system will stop the virus in their nose and throat and they recover fast—75% of children will have no symptoms at all. A regular flu is 3–4 times more likely to kill a child than Covid-19. Being a schoolteacher is the safest occupation—children don’t pass it upward to parents, teachers or grandparents, they catch it from adults. So much for the messaging in the media that children needed to be isolated so they don’t “kill your grandparents.” These facts amply demonstrate the pointlessness of exposing children to an experimental gene therapy that has now been established to have more than 1,200 adverse reactions, including death.[1]
Dr. Bayfield explained that the medical literature proves that children subjected to trauma are at higher risk for disease in later life. Due to parental mask wearing and anxiety, many infants aren’t meeting critical developmental milestones, resulting in reduced IQ, delayed speech and other problems. Parents are being forced between choosing an experimental ‘vaccine’ and their kids’ participation in school and society. The court-ordered release in the US of Pfizer’s clinical trial data is finally revealing the full extent of potential harms to both children and adults. But for many families, it’s already too late. The doctors showed slides of the many children and adolescents either killed or permanently injured by the ‘vaccines.’
“How does a parent make an informed decision in the absence of data?” asked Dr. Bayfield. “There’s a huge discrepancy, so what’s going on? We know Big Pharma has been complicit in these harms and has a long history of deceiving the public.”[2]
To illustrate the point she showed a slide of historical ads promoting smoking and Thalidomide for pregnant women, and regulatory agencies allowing heroin, asbestos, DDT and other toxins on the market.
“We admit that people have fallen sick with Covid and some have died,” said Dr. Malthouse. “We’re not belittling that fact. But we know they’re not coming after our kids for their health.”
“If we’re not going to speak up about the potential harms to our children, we’re complicit in those harms,” added Dr. Sclater.
The Gold Standard: Natural Immunity
Rather than subjecting their children to the roulette wheel of Covid jabs, trusting to their powerful innate immune systems is the more sensible course given their low-to-zero risk of mortality from coronavirus. There are 10 high quality international research papers proving that Covid patients develop “natural, robust, cross-reactive and long-lasting immunity superior to that given by Pfizer vaccine; natural immunity will cover all variants.”[3] A recent 20-month study from Sweden showed that people infected at the beginning of the study still had strong natural immunity at the end of the study period.[4] Other studies have shown that even those exposed to the earlier strain of coronavirus, SARS-CoV-1, have had natural immunity that has lasted years. The doctors estimated that 70% of Canadians now have natural immunity.
“The real data are that 0.01% of unvaccinated end up in hospital,” said Dr. Bayfield. “And natural immunity is 95% effective in preventing reinfection. God gave us an immune system that works.”
Early Treatment Works
Dr. Bayfield did her own research and found that there are effective treatment protocols for Covid-19 that are so effective they make the ‘vaccines’ unnecessary. Through the Canadian Covid Care Alliance (CCCA) she discovered a protocol using both Ivermectin and nutraceuticals (vitamins). Patients she treated with this protocol had their blood oxygen levels return to 95% of normal within 2–3 days. In the US, Dr. Zelenko has replicated these results with thousands of patients—so far he claims to have lost no patients to Covid-19.[5] Yet the BC College of Physicians and Surgeons issued an order to its members that the use of Ivermectin was prohibited.
Dr. Malthouse explained that all the studies for early treatment show a positive outcome, once one discounts the “fake studies” such as the famously retracted Ivermectin study in The Lancet. If you have an adequate amount of vitamin D in your body you have zero risk of death from Covid-19, according to one study. For most people 4,000 IU per day is adequate; it needs to be taken with K2 to prevent calcification of blood vessels. You may need a blood test to see what your levels are. It’s a protection against cancer and is good for bones. Multi-vitamins for immune support should include the minerals molybdenum, zinc, and magnesium.
Even for adults, more than 80% of Covid deaths in BC (and Canada) have been in those aged over 80. Statistics now show that the survival rate of those known to be infected in BC was 99.97%. The doctors showed graphs revealing that deaths from all-cause mortality showed very little change until the ‘vaccines’ were rolled out; like the famous ‘hockey stick’ graph of global carbon dioxide levels, it shows a giant leap in deaths for 2021–22.
“That makes it clear we did not have a pandemic; we had a ‘plandemic,’” said Dr. Malthouse.
Would You Spin This Roulette Wheel?
Dr. Malthouse explained the three phases of pathology post-vaccination: 1) viral proliferation; 2) a cytokine storm (also known as pathogenic priming) of spike proteins in which the immune system reacts, causing inflammation throughout the body; and, 3) this inflammation causes micro-clotting (thrombosis) preventing oxygen transfer from the lungs to the bloodstream. By stage 3, very little virus remains. What does remain from the mRNA injections is an implanted spike protein factory “that has no off switch,” causing the body to continue to manufacture this potentially deadly protein. Studies show that the viral load is 250 times higher in the vaccinated, with data showing the highest incidence of Covid relapse among the fully vaccinated.[6] The ‘vaccine’ has been shown in studies to interfere with cellular repair and the immune system is significantly altered for several weeks after the injection.
When Simpson asked for a show of hands in response to the question: “How many of you know someone who has been injured or killed by the Covid jab?” a clear majority of the audience raised their hands. Later during question period, one woman alone said she has lost four family members to fatal adverse reactions. Dr. Sclater showed a slide noting that there are now 1,000 peer-reviewed studies showing vaccine-related harms, “so the narrative is starting to crumble.”[7] None of the vaccines have been proven to prevent transmission, as admitted recently by US CDC director Rachel Walensky. Evidence shows there’s so little similarity between original Covid-19 virus and Omicron that the vaccines are unlikely to be effective. Dr. Bayfield noted that doctors in BC are legally required to report vaccine injuries even if they’re not sure.
“Don’t let your injury be discredited or go unreported.” —Dr. Sofia Bayfield
“More deaths in the past 18 months are due to Covid-19 vaccines than for all other vaccines combined over 30 years,” said Dr. Sclater. “I would say if you’ve had the first dose don’t get the second, if you’ve had the second don’t get the third. Death is not an acceptable side effect of vaccines.”[8]
Simpson said that in discussions with people during their tours across the province it’s clear that different ‘vaccine’ batches have differing levels of toxicity. This partly explains the wide discrepancy in adverse reactions. She advised consulting the website https://howbadismybatch.com
“It makes you realize this is a big experiment and we’re all guinea pigs,” says Dr. Malthouse. “Just say no when it comes to your kids.”
The Nudge Factor
Dr. Bayfield spoke about the expert manner in which governments and health authorities have manipulated the public into accepting such outsized risks for ‘protection’ from a virus of such low lethality. Known as ‘nudge theory,’ it uses key phrases to motivate people toward certain actions, for example, “Don’t kill grandma—get your shot.” The constant refrain of ‘new variants’ is another nudge tactic, stimulating fear response in the amygdala, which bypasses the frontal cortex where higher reasoning occurs. For parents, it impairs their ability to make well thought out, calm decisions that affect their child’s life. In Words from the Dead I wrote about how governments employed military level psychological operations to goad their populations into fear and panic.[9]
“We can have a ‘counter nudge,’” said Dr. Bayfield. “If you know someone who has been vaccine injured, ask how they feel about that. What was it like for them? If you say, ‘masks don’t work,’ that could shut down discussion. Instead you could say, ‘It’s so wonderful to see peoples’ faces again.’”
Speaking Truth to Power
Whatever you might think of the issues, these doctors have all taken great risks in order to follow their consciences and alert the public to the truth. Dr. Bayfield has been prohibited from doing any more palliative care work. Like her colleagues on the panel, she has been investigated by the BC College of Physicians and Surgeons as if she were a criminal—simply for holding to a high standard of medical ethics. Dr. Bonnie Henry’s order requiring members of all healthcare professions to reveal their vaccination status or lose their licenses is yet another totalitarian move currently facing legal action. Dr. Bayfield was smeared in mainstream media for her stand and her email leaked to the public, although she actually received hundreds of messages of support. Dr. Malthouse was ready to retire prior to Covid-19. “I could have sat this one out,” he said, but he chose instead to advocate for patients’ rights.
Dr. Sclater referred to the film The Matrix and its famous red pill/blue pill analogy. (Once you accept the red pill, you can’t unsee what you’ve seen.) He credits his wife with doing the research that woke him up to the harms being committed in the guise of healthcare, or “red-pilling me,” as well as meeting Nelson, BC nurse Corinne Mori, who spoke out after being fired for refusing vaccination. But he noted that there are costs for the red-pilled: it can cause you to lose jobs, friends, family members and faith associations within your community.
“What the truckers started, it’s up to doctors to finish,” concluded Dr. Sclater.
Postscript: Question Period
All three doctors graciously remained for an extensive question period following their presentations, despite having to prepare for another event at Trail in the evening. The medical profession of late has made much of the principle that causation is difficult or even impossible to prove. As the only independent journalist in the room, I asked the panel: “What about the Bradford Hill criteria for causation? Why do you think the medical and scientific professions aren’t making the connection between the vaccines and adverse reactions?”
Dr. Bayfield answered that her profession has been conditioned over the years to simply accept what the experts say. Dr. Malthouse added that the conditioning is so subtle most doctors don’t even know they’re conditioned.
“It’s not that they’re pushing this narrative because they get paid to, they actually believe it. The germ theory of disease is keeping them so busy prescribing drugs and then dealing with the side effects that they don’t have time to keep up with studies, so they simply do what experts tell them to do.” —Dr. Stephen Malthouse
One article goes so far as to call the Bradford Hill criteria “the forgotten predicate,” [10] although Sir Austin Bradford Hill did not use the term “criteria” in his original lecture delivered to the Royal Society of Medicine January 14, 1965.[11] Still, Dr. Bradford Hill’s research was a key factor in settling the association between smoking and lung cancer—a conclusion tobacco companies fought desperately to avoid.
It also explains why Pfizer requested that their trial data not be released for 75 years.
NOTE ON SOURCES: Because this article is largely a transcription of the Doctors on Tour presentation, I do not have all the sources cited by Drs. Bayfield, Malthouse and Sclater. Where possible I have located supporting references and footnoted them, aligning them as closely as possible with the doctors’ quoted sources. As more references become available I will post them. This article is not intended as medical advice but as a transcription or paraphrase of comments made during the Doctors on Tour presentation.
[1] “CHD Says Pfizer Clinical Trial Data Contradicts ‘Safe and Effective’ Government/Industry Mantra,” Children’s Health Defense, March 3, 2022: https://childrenshealthdefense.org/press-release/chd-says-pfizer-clinical-trial-data-contradicts-safe-and-effective/ SEE ALSO: “Court ordered documents Pfizer tried to seal for 55 years,” Celia Farber, The Pandemic Papers, December 5, 2021, published in print by Common Ground magazine.
[2] See also: “Scientific Fraud and the CDC,” Dr. Robert Malone, Substack, February 24, 2022:
[3] “Lasting immunity found after recovery from COVID-19,” US National Institutes of Health, January 26, 2021: https://www.nih.gov/news-events/nih-research-matters/lasting-immunity-found-after-recovery-covid-19 SEE ALSO: “Protective Immunity after Natural Infection with Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome Coronavirus-2 (SARS-CoV-2),” US National Library of Medicine, PubMed Central, October 12, 2021: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8506664/
[4] “Risk of SARS-CoV-2 reinfection and COVID-19 hospitalisation,” The Lancet Infectious Diseases, March 31, 2022, states: “The risk of SARS-CoV-2 reinfection and COVID-19 hospitalisation in individuals who have survived and recovered from a previous infection remained low for up to 20 months.”: https://www.thelancet.com/journals/laninf/article/PIIS1473-3099(22)00143-8/fulltext
[5] Zelenko Treatment Protocol: https://vladimirzelenkomd.com/treatment-protocol/ Zelenko Prophylaxis Protocol:https://vladimirzelenkomd.com/prophylaxis-protocol/
[6] “Government of Canada data shows the Triple Vaccinated are over 5x more likely to die of Covid-19 than the Unvaccinated,” The Daily Exposé, UK, April 10, 2022: https://dailyexpose.uk/2022/03/23/gov-canada-data-triple-vaccinated-5x-likely-die-covid/
[7] According to a November 15, 2021 preprint study by Kyle A. Beattie, “89.84% of statistically significant countries showed an increase in total deaths per million associated with COVID-19 due directly to the causal impact of treatment initiation…” Beattie’s conclusion is based on a data analysis of 145 countries. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/356248984_Worldwide_Bayesian_Causal_Impact_Analysis_of_Vaccine_Administration_on_Deaths_and_Cases_Associated_with_COVID-19_A_BigData_Analysis_of_145_Countries
[8] “Nearly 70% of recent COVID deaths in Canada were ‘fully vaccinated’ citizens, gov’t data shows,” LifeSite News, February 17, 2022: https://www.lifesitenews.com/opinion/nearly-70-of-recent-covid-deaths-in-canada-were-fully-vaccinated-citizens-govt-data-shows/?utm_source=popular
[9] Sean Arthur Joyce, Words from the Dead: Relevant Readings in the Covid Age, Ekstasis Editions, 2022, pp. 137–38.
[10] “The Bradford Hill Criteria: the Forgotten Predicate,” Dr. Frank C. Woodside III & Allison G. Davis. Woodside and Davis are lawyers representing manufacturers of pharmaceutical and medical devices, and other consumer products. Naturally it is in their clients’ interests to disprove causation in relation to such products. https://www.dinsmore.com/content/uploads/2017/06/woodside20620132013.pdf
[11] “The Environment and Disease: Association or Causation?” Sir Austin Bradford Hill, Proceedings of the Royal Society of Medicine, May 1965: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1898525/
These 3 doctors are truly medical professionals (Pro). Want to know if your family doctor is?
Is your doctor a medical professional or a paid whore for the pharma cartel? A simple question for your doctor to determine if they are a "Pro or Ho":
"Should healthy children under the age of 12 get the shots?".
If the answer isn't "NO" then you have a "Ho". There is no "yes" or "it depends". The IFR for healthy kids is so far to the right of the decimal that they have a statistically ZERO chance of dying from covid. It is of zero benefit for them to get the shots. It also is of zero benefit to anyone else because they will still get it and transmit it, injected or not.
ASK YOUR DOCTOR.
We were there to support those brave doctors, and if others dont wake up to the lies being spoon feed them we will continue to have a sick care society as it makes more money than keeping people well. Long ago in china they paid doctors to keep the village safe and if too many died they didnt get a wage or died themselves. Times do keep a changing and we swing back to find a balance.